I still surprised they even gave him a boat in the first place.
All yelling and angry words will surely make people like him more though. I mean it worked in the primaries, right?
Pretty sure they gave him the boat in the same way you give a pirate your booty. Which, coincidentally, is a place Trump will grab you by if you aren't careful.
President Obama Signs Babies Act, Mandates Baby Changing Stations Be Available To Dads Too.
Easily solved if people would just get over cooties and we could all use the same restroom. I mean, we went down from 4 to 2, so it's like we halfway figured it out but then decided to stop.
"disloyal Republicans" pussies the lot of them, but don't worry Trump's got his hand in them.
Don't worry, a lot of them are falling back in line with Supreme Leader Trump. Apparently he really wouldn't lose support even if he did kill someone in broad daylight.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
President Obama Signs Babies Act, Mandates Baby Changing Stations Be Available To Dads Too.
Easily solved if people would just get over cooties and we could all use the same restroom. I mean, we went down from 4 to 2, so it's like we halfway figured it out but then decided to stop.
Let's do it. Family restrooms are the awesome. Ones at the mall have 2 toilets and a changing table, that means all 3 can do their thing and I'm out of there with enough time to linger in the lego store for a while.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Ahhhh... ok, sure. I'm not sure that the same reasons apply (well, I am sure that they don't) but I'm following you now.
I mean, obviously one is race and one is gender, but with regards to people finding it superficially distasteful and others worrying about negative incidents resulting from that distaste, isn't it fairly similar?
Sources in the Cruz and Rubio campaigns admit that they just started collecting opposition on Trump a few weeks ago, for a candidate that declared in June 2015. SuperPACs that wanted to go after him were told to stand down by big money donors who (a) didn't want Trump's ire directed at them and (b) stopped trusting these PAC guys after their disastrous 2012 results and the Jeb! fiasco. [...] In contrast, Clinton is already going against Trump. They've reportedly been collecting opposition on him since he declared and it'll be all cannons on him, not this ******* around to see who gets to be the "establishment lane" and who gets the "evangelical lane".
Watching a couple videos that apparently came out today about Trump. Usual stuff with him saying questionable, creepy things using some poor judgement from years ago.
But there was one comment on a video that stood out. Made me laugh...
Quote:
When a little girl says she wants to date her dad when she grows up, that's cute and innocent. But when her dad says it, his name is probably Donald Trump.
I read the NY Times article publish this evening of 2 women who came forward with their stories of him sexually assaulting them. When the reporter called him to ask him questions, he blew up at her and started yelling and going on that if they publish the article he would sue them. Now my twitter feed is full of reports from inside his campaign saying the suit is being prepare now to be filed against the Times tonight.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare
This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
Trump won't sue. Or he'll sue to show his supporters how "tough" he is and then drop suit after November 8th. The discovery phase would kill him.
A writer for People Magazine put out a story about how Trump assaulted her during an interview. It'll be hard to dismiss that as some random woman just seeking attention.
Kurt Eichenwald notices Russia falsely reporting on a Wikileaks document and, out of amazing coincidence (heh), Trump putting it into a speech.
This won't get 5% of the Pussy Tape coverage, of course.
Edited, Oct 10th 2016 9:48pm by Jophiel
lol, okay. Hopefully this won't get 5% since it's 100% ********* Try being patient or being curious about facts/naked claims without any evidence whatsoever...
In fact, Eichenwald literally has zero evidence for any of that. The point is not that his evidence for these propositions is inconclusive or unpersuasive; the point is that there is zero evidence for any of it.
You are apparently uninterested in actual facts and instead just get your news by Twitter, it seems.
"Someone on Twitter claimed something!
"It must be true!" "Let's not investigate!!!" "Uh durrrrr....."
I'm not sure where the idea that it's bullshit comes from. Wikileaks did, in fact, drop the hacked document and Sputnik did, in fact, publish an edited version that misattributed lines to Blumenthal. Which was then picked up by the Trump campaign and used at a rally. Which is exactly what I said happened.
Maybe stick to freaking out about Obama once every six months.