Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Omnibus Politics Thread: Campaign 2016 EditionFollow

#2227 Jan 29 2017 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Oh, and I hope Trump steps in to deal with people applying this to Green Card holders. Though, in truth, it sounds like there's some confusion on the matter.
Quote:
News reports suggested the White House overruled the Department of Homeland Security’s recommendations on excluding green-card holders from the executive orders. Preibus, on Meet the Press, denied that, then appeared to suggest that the order won’t affect permanent residents going forward, but when pressed appeared to contradict himself.

“We didn’t overrule the Department of Homeland Security, as far as green-card holders moving forward, it doesn't affect them,” he said. But when pressed by Chuck Todd, the show’s host, on whether the order affected green-card holders, he replied: “Well, of course it does. If you’re traveling back and forth, you’re going to be subjected to further screening.”
#2228 Jan 29 2017 at 8:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Simpler version of what I wrote here:

When the argument is "Trump has ignored precedent in ways that 'precedent' alone isn't enough to give him the benefit of the doubt", defending his actions with "But look! Precedent!" proves little more than how much you missed the point.

Edited, Jan 29th 2017 9:15pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2229 Jan 30 2017 at 7:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I'm curious about the timing of the mass firing at the State Department the day before this ban was announced.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2230 Jan 30 2017 at 8:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Was there a firing? I had heard that the upper echelon resigned a couple days ago but hadn't heard that they were fired or of anyone else being fired.

Not doubting, mind you. Just hadn't heard.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2231 Jan 30 2017 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jophiel wrote:
Re: TPP -- It looks as though Australia and some other TPP nations are courting China to fill the US's place in a agreement that was originally intended as a hedge against them so... yay! Great job! Smiley: laugh

And now the Pacific Alliance (Mexico, Colombia, Chile & Peru) is talking about strengthening their pact and working closer with the European Union.

Trump's policies have been great for trade so far -- provided you're not the United States.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2232 Jan 30 2017 at 8:50 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
So far the most amusing thing thanks to ol' 45's ban is that an Oscar nominated director is apparently banned from entering the country for the event.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2233 Jan 30 2017 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
Oh, you hadn't heard? YOU HADN'T HEARD?

Perhaps you can hear this: uh, check your privilege, maybe?

It's easy not to hear people when you step on them in your oversized man shoes, isn't it? Jophiel? You fucking punk? Your white, male, heterosexual president that YOU voted for did this, and you didn't hear about it - why is that?

Because the people he's persecuting aren't your kind of people. They're highly experienced governmental officials, and you find that alienating.

Because their voices are so quiet, and every label you can stick to them turns the volume one notch lower. Black, queer, undersecretary for management. They're all the same to you.

Because your dad used to beat you with his old belt to the yakety sax theme.

Well, if I might be so bold as to say it - those reasons fucking suck. And so do you.

Edited, Jan 30th 2017 9:53am by Kavekkk
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2234 Jan 30 2017 at 8:52 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
Sorry for breaking the filter everyone but I really needed to call Jophiel out on his behaviour just now
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2235 Jan 30 2017 at 8:56 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Wait. Joph voted for Trump? This liberal conspiracy goes deep.

Edited, Jan 30th 2017 10:01am by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#2236 Jan 30 2017 at 9:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
TirithRR wrote:
Wait. Joph voted for Trump?

The punk I was cry-fucking to Yakety Sax told me to.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2237 Jan 30 2017 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
It's statistically likely, given his demographics. Jophiel might protest otherwise, but can he prove it?

We all know there are a lot of Trump voters out there who won't admit to it openly, who'll make all the right noises about minority rights and immigrants and democracy and then go into the booth and vote wrong. And unless Jophiel can show otherwise, I'm putting him squarely in that group.

Also, did you know that queer is filtered? That's some check your privilege **** right there.

Edited, Jan 30th 2017 10:20am by Kavekkk
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2238 Jan 30 2017 at 9:26 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Samira wrote:
I'm curious about the timing of the mass firing at the State Department the day before this ban was announced.


Jophiel wrote:
Was there a firing? I had heard that the upper echelon resigned a couple days ago but hadn't heard that they were fired or of anyone else being fired.

Not doubting, mind you. Just hadn't heard.

It was just the usual leaving of political appointees.
Quote:
The State Department said that the four officials had submitted their resignations at the start of the new administration, as is standard practice with all political appointees throughout the executive branch of the government. Reporters who have covered the State Department for years said the Post report was overstating a normal feature of a transition. The American Foreign Service Association (AFSA), a sort of union for foreign service officers, also stepped into the fray, releasing an unusual public statement that said the entire thing was overblown.
#2239 Jan 30 2017 at 9:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kavekkk wrote:
We all know there are a lot of Trump voters out there who won't admit to it openly, who'll make all the right noises about minority rights and immigrants and democracy and then go into the booth and vote wrong. And unless Jophiel can show otherwise, I'm putting him squarely in that group.

Shit, I forgot my ballot selfie in my other suit.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2240 Jan 30 2017 at 10:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Re: the State Department departures, I'm not arguing that their on-file resignations should not have been accepted; that's certainly within the rights of a new administration. However, it seems precipitous to me, at least, to release the leadership of an entire division (except for, I think, HR) without having replacements in place or even chosen. That makes implementation sort of problematic, as we've seen, and incidentally sacrifices any experienced advice about how to best handle such a move.

I kind of weirdly sympathize with the impulse to shake things up. I'm just not sure canning everyone who knows how to get things done before you or anyone you've brought on with you knows how to get things done is a great idea. Bureaucracies don't turn on a dime.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2241 Jan 30 2017 at 10:49 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Samira wrote:
I'm just not sure canning everyone who knows how to get things done before you or anyone you've brought on with you knows how to get things done is a great idea.
If the cabinet hearings are any indication then knowing how to get things done (or what the job even is) isn't exactly a priority.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2242 Jan 30 2017 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Shit, I forgot my ballot selfie in my other suit.


If you're not willing to break the law to virtue signal then frankly I think we all know which side you're on, Mr.Ivotedforthelawandordercandidate.

By, uh, by the way, you might want to change your surname, it's a little cumbersome.
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2243 Jan 30 2017 at 11:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You should see my credit card.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2244 Jan 30 2017 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Maybe if you'd stop canceling them before I can use them ... Smiley: motz
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2245 Jan 30 2017 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Everyone of foreign race
Will love der fuehrer's face
When we bring to the world disorder
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#2246 Jan 30 2017 at 11:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
If nothing else this Trump guy has been as entertaining as promised. Action-orientated, getting things done, changing stuff, going with the whole "I'm an alpha male" personality bit to the end, and pushing the agenda with it. I'm just going to sit back and enjoy watching this for a while and wonder how long he'll be able to keep this head of steam going.

Reminds me vaguely about a couple of research papers I leafed through a while back Hush. It's called being bored at work with access to lots of subscription scientific journals for free. Smiley: tongue about the behavior of different types of alpha males in primate groups. Long story short the more benevolent alphas tended not to last as long on top, but their downfall came with less disruption, and they generally lived on along the fringes of the group and usually weren't badly treated after their reign was over. The more aggressive alphas however, tended to stay on top a bit longer, but their downfall also tended to be swift and violent. The pent up aggression of the other members being unleashed once it was clear they were weakening.

It's probably not as relevant to modern society; still all the more reason to stay tuned.

Smiley: popcorn
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#2247 Jan 30 2017 at 12:08 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Jophiel wrote:
When the argument is "Trump has ignored precedent in ways that 'precedent' alone isn't enough to give him the benefit of the doubt", defending his actions with "But look! Precedent!" proves little more than how much you missed the point.


So is Trumps adherence to this 'precedent' in this one case just a way to avoid the "Religious Litmus Test" thing? Cause on NPR this morning that was what they were talking about. Can't ban all Muslims, can't have a Religious Litmus Test to entering to the US. But if it's just specific countries, and not all Muslims, then it's not really a litmus test, right? (Or, at least, would be arguable that it's not).

The fact that he and/or his companies do business just being icing on that cake of Islamophobia he baked all election cycle?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#2248 Jan 30 2017 at 12:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, he already said that Christian refugees would be given priority, so he's already skating on very thin ice.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2249 Jan 30 2017 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Everyone of foreign race
Will love der fuehrer's face
When we bring to the world disorder
Hit single from Disney's The Fuhrer.

Disclaimer: Use your own judgement people.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2250 Jan 30 2017 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
When the argument is "Trump has ignored precedent in ways that 'precedent' alone isn't enough to give him the benefit of the doubt", defending his actions with "But look! Precedent!" proves little more than how much you missed the point.


So is Trumps adherence to this 'precedent' in this one case just a way to avoid the "Religious Litmus Test" thing? Cause on NPR this morning that was what they were talking about. Can't ban all Muslims, can't have a Religious Litmus Test to entering to the US. But if it's just specific countries, and not all Muslims, then it's not really a litmus test, right? (Or, at least, would be arguable that it's not).

The fact that he and/or his companies do business just being icing on that cake of Islamophobia he baked all election cycle?
I just think that it's quite convenient Obama left him with a list of countries to use that just happen to be ones he doesn't do business with and somehow also bans all the muslims except all the ones that are from countries not on the list.

Or people are reading too much into it. Smiley: tongue
#2251 Jan 30 2017 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Samira wrote:
Well, he already said that Christian refugees would be given priority, so he's already skating on very thin ice.


Wasn't it... "persecuted religious minorities" or something like that? Sure, it's code word for Christians in Muslim countries, but I think one NPR discussion was saying something about the minority sects of Islam. Not that I believe for any moment that anything this administration would do would benefit any Shi'ite (or, which ever sect is the one being wiped out... I'm not up on my Islamic stuff).
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 303 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (303)