Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Harry Potter book 6 ending(contains spoilers)Follow

#27 Aug 05 2005 at 10:57 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
What if Voldemort's intention was not to kill Harry, but to use his body as a vessel in the future. If you remember, it took Harry's blood to finally bring Voldemort back. Also, Harry does possess some traits that only an heir to Slytherin could have, such as parseltongue


Voldemort didn't need Harry's blood to get back, just the blood of someone who feared and/or hated him. Harry's blood was more convenient for Voldemort as this would also bypass the magical protection Harry's mother left him, and also it would be more suiting for Voldemort to use his mortal enemy to bring him back.

As for Harry being a parseltongue, that's because Voldemort transfered some of his power to Harry just before he almost perished from his failed Ada Kedavra curse. But it is possible that Harry is still the bearer of the final horcrux, just not very likely imo.
#28 Aug 05 2005 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
***
2,328 posts
These are the conclusions I have come too after rereading the series 3 times and discussing one numerous message boards for the last few weeks.

Definites:
1: Dumbledore is dead, he was not begging for his own life, he was begging for Snape and Malfoy's lives. He knew that Snape was going to have to kill him, and was begging him to go through with it.

2: Snape isn't evil, killing Dumbledore will bring him into Moldiemort's complete confidence, maybe even allowing him to kill him.

3: R.A.B. is Regulas A Black, Sirius' brother, the locket was mentioned in order of the phoenix as a locket in the black house that was heavy and noone could open.

4: Harry was definitly not intented to BE a horcrux but the be the sacrifice, however, the way it was described it sound like he became one unintantionally, though this doesn't really work with the prophecy, if Moldiemort and all the other horcrux's are destroyed Harry would become the new Dark Lord.

5: Harry giving up Ginny is his acceptance of the epic hero's path, the end of which is death, real or metaphorical. Wether he wins or loses Harry will leave the wizarding world. If he beats Voldemort, if he finishes him off, the world will change and he will be unable to live in it. He hates fame, and destroying the Dark lord a second time, he would never get a moments peace.

Guesses:
6: Ron and Hermoine will get married have a son and name him Harry.

7: Fleur and Bill will have a son and name him Lupin.

8: The final battle between Harry and Voldemort will either be in Godrics hollow, or the burning remains of Hogwarts castle(or just the great hall).

9: Dobby will die to save Harry's life.

10: Voldemort will show up the day Harry's protection runs out at the Dursley's, he will of course get away by apparation.

Edited, Fri Aug 5 20:35:21 2005 by Darkuwa
#29 Aug 06 2005 at 9:59 PM Rating: Excellent
These books are so cool !.! I've read everyone like so many times its not even funny but I cant believe they killed dumbledore. That seems a little harsh >o< number seven better be awesome cause I love these books and I dont want to be let down or anything <.<
#30 Aug 09 2005 at 12:31 AM Rating: Decent
*
188 posts
Quote:
Here a theory: what if Harry's scar is the last horcrux?


thats exactly wat i thought as soon as it said bout the horcrux's!!!
#31 Aug 11 2005 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
1 inside Voldemort
1 nside Nagini the snake
1 inside the Hufflepuff cup
1 inside the Slytherin necklace
1 inside the ring on DD's hand
1 inside the book
1 inside the scar

So should be all thats left is voldemort? Voldemort is the only one who can kill Harry because of the protection his mother gave him.
#32 Aug 17 2005 at 10:55 PM Rating: Decent
**
730 posts
I also came to the conclusion that Regulus Black, Sirius`s brother, is the mystery RAB, and there`s a lot of evidence to support that.

Firstly, the note was addressed specifically to "The Dark Lord". That would suggest that whoever wrote it was a Death Eater, sonce Harry points out to Snape that only Death Eaters call Voldemort that. Secondly, Regulus is the only member of Sirius`s family to have been mentioned but not to have featured in the books, and JK seems to have gone out of her way to remind us that he used be a Death Eater, but tried to back out. Sirius says he got scared and tried to run, but as we know, Sirius has been out of contact with his family for years. Apart from that, the initials obviously fit.

Now, onto the matter of Snape and Dumbledore. Dumbledore most likely is dead, never to return, with the possible exception of forcing his echo out of Snape`s wand. As for Dumbledore begging for his life, Dumbledore probably wasn`t quite in his right mind at the time, due to the effects of the potion, which, as demonstrated in the cave, causes intense fear and pain. What interests me most about that scene is that every other Death Eater back away to clear a path for Snape, as if they were scared. Now, why would Snape kill Dumbledore? I can see several possibilities in this, and there are probably several more I haven`t seen.

Firstly, Snape is alligned to Voldemort and has been plotting this from day 1. I consider this one unlikely, since Snape protected Harry out in the grounds.

Secondly, the whole thing was framed and Dumbledore is not dead. This one is, if anything, even more unlikely.

Thirdly, Snape was forced to kill Dumbledore by the Unbreakable Vow he swore. Quite possibly the vow does not cause the bearer to die die if broken, but is exactly what it sounds like-unbreakable.

Fourthly, Dumbledore set his own death up, possibly with Snape`s knowledge. At first, this one seems unlikely in the extreme, but consider: Dumbledore makes a point that one of the most powerful weapons Harry has is his absolute determination, caused by his hatred of Voldemort. The reason for that is that Voldemort has been responsible for the deaths of his parents and Sirius. The only thing that could make him hate Voldemort more and thus make him more determined and more dangerous (barring the death of Ron, Hermione, Ginny, etc) is the death of Dumbledore himself. JK also makes the point that Dumbledore is unafraid of the sacrifice for the right cause ("The loss of hand does not seem an unreasonable exchange for a seventh of Voldemort`s soul") and that he feels that death in not such a great fear. ("To the well organised mind, death is but the next great adventure", "Once again, Voldemort fails to grasp that there are worse things than physical pain.") how about the sacrifice of his own life to give Harry the power to destroy Voldemort once and for all?

Finally, the idea of Harry`s scar as a Horcrux. I hadn`t considered this before, but it makes a lot of sense. There are a lot of similarites between Voldemort and Harry, as pointed out throughout the books. Also, as Dumbledore points out, Harry was likely to be the sacrifice needed to make Voldemort`s seventh and final Horcrux. If something were to go wrong with that process, the result could well be the transferring of a seventh of Voldemort`s soul to Harry. On the other hand, there is evidence against this. The most obvious one is that Voldemort has tried to kill Harry several times. The three possible explanations are that Voldemort is willing to sacrifice a seventh of his soul to destroy Harry (unlikely, Voldemort seems to be of an "everything or nothing" mindset, although he did put the diary at risk to reopen the Chamber of Secrets), that Harry is not the final Horcrux, or that Voldemort doesn`t know he transferred a part of his soul. However, even if Harry is the final Horcrux, that does not write out the possibility of an 8th. If Voldemort is unaware that he made a Harry a Horcrux or if he intends to destroy Harry regardless, he would want a 7th or to replace the lost one.

In closing, did anyone else think the end, with Harry breaking up with Ginny at the funeral of the man who tried to replace his father, was ripped stright out of Spider-man?
#33 Aug 24 2005 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
The theory about harry being a horcrux is not very likely.
as we dont know ANYTHING about how to make a horcrux but that anyone has to die we dont know if its possible to make a living thing a horcrux and if voldemort could make harry a horcrux though he was protected by his mother...
after readung this thread im convinced that dumbledores dead and that theres something faked about it.
the greatest wizard of all times, the only person voldemort was afraid of...finished off by an ugly potionmaker, a child and some death eaters? never! maybe the thing about the potion he drank and the loss of power he suffered would matter but i think dumbledore would have fighted, and i mean malfoy...malfoys a fool, i dont think he could just come in and disarm DD. thats just not logic.
The argument that the avada kedavra doesnt make people fall off towers seems interesting, too,but i am not really sure how that tower looked and evrything(was so fixed on knowing what would happen next that i didnt really read the description of the place carefully)so maybe he cpuld just have fallen because he died, fell to the floor, but the floor ended somewhere of course and he fell into that "somewhere". after reading this im not really that sure anymore that hes dead ^^
but anyways, if hes dead or not there is something faked, it doesnt fit with dumbledores person to beg for his life, espacially as someone before me mentioned DD thinks death is just "another adventure" for genius minds(as he really is one).

So im not really sure if this book is good. it was really nice to read and i couldnt stop once i started.
There are to possibilities.
On the one hand it could be the best book of 1-6. it would be the best if really evrything fits and is gonna be "revealed"(sry, cant think of a better word now...im german) in the next book OR
Rowling just wrote **** didnt think of her characters personalities and its just as easy as it looks first without htinking about it.
The only way to find out is waiting -.- i hate waiting, im a very impatient human.
hope, this is readable, for someone who really speaks/writes english, i did my best

so far



#34 Sep 03 2005 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
The gryffindor horcrux is probably the sword of Godric that Harry receives from the Sorting Hat in Chamber of Secrets.

I also believe that Dumbledore's death was staged. And where was Voldemort??? No appearance was surprising.

#35 Sep 03 2005 at 6:51 PM Rating: Good
Other then some minor flaws your use of english is quite good TheSight so no worries ^-^

and one more note, I was thinking with all the emphasize on unspoken spells in this book maybe Dumbledore planned with snape and snape used an unspoken spell to launch him out the window as well as put him in a sort of fake death and then said the Avada Kadavera outloud knowing that it wouldnt effect dumbledore for some reason ?.? just another idea throwing it out there. Have at it ^-^
#36 Oct 30 2005 at 11:29 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,328 posts
Contrary to what J.K. Rowling believes, Vin Diesel is actually the Dark Lord, Chosen One, R.A.B., Half-Blood Prince, and the missing horcrux.
#37 Dec 18 2005 at 8:39 PM Rating: Decent
*
125 posts
Bromen wrote:
I have a theory that most people will probably say "Grasping at straws" but I believe there is ample evidence for it.

Dumbledore is not dead he and Snape faked the death scene.


I agree with you. There is phoenix (from death comes life) imagery plastered all over his death. Also, if Snape really wanted Harry/Dumbledore dead he could've simply bewitched Draco with the courage to do them.

Also, did anyone notice the several references to the sword in Dumbledore's office? Ravenclaw item yep.

The mass coupling (ahem, no pun intended I'm sure) in this book was a little too squishy for me but it had to happen sometime I guess.

What do you all think about the fact that Aragog is dead? o.O Thousands of bloodthirsty spiders with no king? creeeepsies

If Harry isn't in school it will be so far off the beaten path that I'm not sure it would work out.


#38 Dec 18 2005 at 8:41 PM Rating: Decent
*
125 posts
TheSight wrote:
The theory about harry being a horcrux is not very likely.
as we dont know ANYTHING about how to make a horcrux but that anyone has to die we dont know if its possible to make a living thing a horcrux and if voldemort could make harry a horcrux though he was protected by his mother...


Dumbledore says the snake is a horcrux. And your english was fine I think.
#39 Jan 17 2006 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
Skimmed most of these.

I DO believe that DD is dead.

Regarding trusting snape, I believe that at the end of Voldemort many years back, snape made an unbreakable vow to dumbledore, creating an iron-clad trust in snape. If snape is alive, he is good, if he turns bad, he dies.

I believe that whatever happened to him to cause such an injury made his death inevitable. He wasn't Pleading for his life, he was pleading for his death.

I believe the potion he was taking was only to sustain him long enough to pass required info on to harry. And, being doomed, he hatched a plan to fake his murder, when it was actually a suicide. "Severus, please" was a plead to do it, so the plan could continue.

Snape, being possibly the greatest wizard at resisting mind reading, would be the perfect person to get close to voldemort by this, close enough to destroy the snake(Nagini - final horcrux) In addition, Severus was angered by Harry calling him a coward, knowing full well that he had to do it, and it took more strength to kill his friend than cowardice to murder him.

______

As to this fake locket. It is my belief that the initials belong to the one Regulus Black, former death eater and killed by VOLDEMORT's hands. What would be so bad that Voldemort would kill regulus himself? Sure he killed Lily and James, but that was to stop his nemesis. And in the note with the fake locket, it reads "Dark Lord", a praising used by voldemorts followers. He stole it, he destoryed it, he was killed.

Perhaps he was killed without knowledge that he'd actually done what i'm sure voldemort hopes to be impossible. Or voldemort left it there just because he could, maybe to throw off DD in thinking it is real, i don't know. This is all speculaton.

______

As to school next year, i'm sure harry will come back, not all the time though.

It is the perfect base of operations. Tons of friends willing to help, Probibly the most protected building in the world, possibly another horcurx hidden here(I'm sure j.k will do something like that to involve the school).

_______

What is stopping Dumbledore from returning as a ghost and just zipping around to find the other horcruxes?

Lastly, If you pay attention when reading this book, the WAND MAKER has been kidnapped. They mention him buy name and you just have to know his name to understand. Voldemort kidnapped him to make a new wand or alter his current. Remember what happend when His and Harry's wands fight? Nothing! So obviously he needs to fix that.



EDIT: Well, should have read some more posts, this was covered.

Edited, Tue Jan 17 15:43:24 2006 by Bluefury
#40 May 18 2006 at 9:00 PM Rating: Decent
I still think its the scar on Harry's head. We know that someone has to die to make a horcrux. He murdered Harry's mother who was protecting Harry. I dont think Voldemort meant to make Harry a Horcrux with the scar, I think it back fired because of the old magic and it just happened by accident.
#41 May 24 2006 at 4:19 PM Rating: Decent
Zieveraar wrote:
Much better book than part five btw, at least imo. Can't wait for part 7.


You really didn't like book five? Wow, I thought compared to part five that books six was a major let down. It really disappointed me. Book five was my favorite, it was long and full of action and things that you could really relate to and get into while reading (EX: Umbridge, the mean teacher). Book six... Was confusing... It left a lot to be desired. I mean it was good and had a cool idea with the horcruxes but otherwise... Now granted there is to be another book, you'd think there could be at least somewhat more of a conclusion, there as in the other books.
#42 May 29 2006 at 5:18 PM Rating: Decent
34 posts
If no ones said it already, go to Dumbledore Is Not Dead
Its got perfect reasons going through the all the books, evidence of why he's not actually dead. There are so many of them!
Its little things people like myself generally don't notice, like the way "Avada Kevada" effects D. Throughout the whole series, anyone who has had he effects of the death spell has literally dropped dead on the spot, not thrown backward like D.
Also, think of what has been going on with occulmency (or whatever it is)... casting a spell inside your head rather than out loud. Even though Snape said "Avada Kevada", in his head he could've really meant "expelliarmus", as Snape is very good at Occulmency, knocking D off the tower.
The website explains more of how D actually appeard dead after that too... its a good read.
#43 Jul 22 2006 at 11:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,268 posts
As for dumbley not being dead, I'm pretty sure if I'm remembering right, didn't he show up in a picture frame in the headmasters quarters? Pretty sure he sacrificed himself to Snape to save not only Snapes life, but Malfoy's as well.



Me personally, the only reason I like the books is Snape. I want to see what his story is. (There's supposed to be a good explanation about Snape in the 7th book, and I'm assuming it involves Harry's mother.)

And. I'm on allakhazam talking about harry potter. I'm going to go drown myself for a little bit.

Edited, Jul 23rd 2006 at 12:37am EDT by Alecxander
#44 Jul 26 2006 at 6:39 PM Rating: Default
I thoroughly enjoyed the book, though bought it when it first came out...

It was a shock that Dumbledore had died... but I don think he's dead, I reread the book, and saw some things that would make it seem less likely that Dumbledore is actually dead, plus I found a ton more clues at
    http://www.dumbledoreisnotdead.com/



Also did you see that she'll be killing off, i think it was, 2 very important characters in the next book? ZOMG

Edited, Jul 26th 2006 at 7:41pm EDT by Anzalone
#45 Jul 27 2006 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
I don't think Dumbledore is dead either, just for the sole fact that Dumbledore kept saying throughout the series that he 100% trusts Snape, despite what others have said.

Also, after finishing the 6th book, it really made me wonder if there's hope for Draco, afterall.
#46 Aug 14 2006 at 7:21 AM Rating: Decent
**
892 posts
Ok, old thread but good read none the less. Reading all of this... ah will have to reread the entire serie again and pay extra attention to the 'minor' details ;)

I'm still on the fence whether good ol' Dumbly is dead or not. I do think the Avada Kedavra thing might be a clue to that.

Harry being a horcrux seems a bit far fetched but as pointed out before, the making of a horcrux hasn't been explained in to details yet.

Like I said, I need to go read all those books again XD
#47 Sep 05 2006 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
When's the next release?
#48 Sep 06 2006 at 5:14 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
1. Dumbledore pleads for his life. Dumbledore previously said that death is just another adventure or something like that. Why would he be afraid of dying?

2. Dumbledore prevents Harry from interferring with the events up in the tower. Why? Harry is Dumbledore's only hope. If he's so afraid to die, why not have Harry help him?

3. Snape prevents Draco from killing Dumbledore. Why? Perhaps because Draco might actually kill him.

4. According to some readers' observations, the Avada Kedavra spell animation is Snape uses is different from the one used by Voldemort.

AND

We are told that wizards can cast spells without using words, if they concentrate hard enough. We know Dumbledore can because he paralyzes Harry in the tower. And we are told Snape can as well.

Now.. Remember when Harry is chasing Snape and Snape laughs at him because he can't conjure a successful Avada? Snape says something about having to really mean the curse to cast it.

Mazra's Theory:

Snape used a "silent spell" with a somewhat similar spell effect as Avada. He said Avada Kedavra, but since he didn't mean it, he never did cast it. Dumbledore paralyzed Harry to stop him from ruining the whole setup. Snape prevents Draco from casting Avada because he knows Draco would do it to save his family and that it would kill Dumbledore. So he takes over and casts the "fake" spell.

Now, why are we lead to believe that Snape kills Dumbledore?

My thoughts: In the beginning of the book we find out that Snape promises to watch over Draco. We later on find out that Voldemort will kill Draco's father if Draco doesn't kill Dumbledore. To save Draco and his father, Dumbledore fakes his own death. By making it look like Snape killed him, Voldemort would turn his evil eye on Snape and perhaps let him inside the ranks again, giving the Phoenix Order a valuable advantage. Dumbledore pleads for his life to give the impression that Snape kills him mercilessly.

Anyways, just my thoughts.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 44 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (44)