Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

my question isFollow

#1 Mar 23 2005 at 3:28 AM Rating: Decent
Ref to :Terri Schiavo Case
Main Entry: persistent vegetative state
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: a condition of unresponsiveness to mental and physical stimuli and no sign of higher brain function, wherein the patient is kept alive through medical intervention
Usage: medicine

So my question is , is food are means of nutrition now considered medicine?
Will this change society and laws as we know it? Will it include somehow all who are born with brain damaged and are mentally hadicapped in the future be considered to be in vegetative state? And have no rights? Does this or will this change the value of human life as we know it? Do judges hold too much power in making the final decsions?

What are your opinons?
#2 Mar 23 2005 at 5:52 AM Rating: Good
no, the description you posted says it all "no sign of hgiher brain fucntion", people born with brain damage still show signs of higher brain function although they will not be "smart" in most cases. Not in the sense tyhat they are of lower inteligence but in the sense that they cannot function like a "normal" human. Vegetative states are as you can tell when the brain doesnt function at a higher level at all like is the case here
#3 Mar 23 2005 at 5:52 AM Rating: Good
no, the description you posted says it all "no sign of hgiher brain fucntion", people born with brain damage still show signs of higher brain function although they will not be "smart" in most cases. Not in the sense tyhat they are of lower inteligence but in the sense that they cannot function like a "normal" human. Vegetative states are as you can tell when the brain doesnt function at a higher level at all like is the case here
#4 Mar 23 2005 at 5:52 AM Rating: Good
no, the description you posted says it all "no sign of hgiher brain fucntion", people born with brain damage still show signs of higher brain function although they will not be "smart" in most cases. Not in the sense tyhat they are of lower inteligence but in the sense that they cannot function like a "normal" human. Vegetative states are as you can tell when the brain doesnt function at a higher level at all like is the case here
#5 Mar 23 2005 at 5:52 AM Rating: Good
no, the description you posted says it all "no sign of hgiher brain fucntion", people born with brain damage still show signs of higher brain function although they will not be "smart" in most cases. Not in the sense tyhat they are of lower inteligence but in the sense that they cannot function like a "normal" human. Vegetative states are as you can tell when the brain doesnt function at a higher level at all like is the case here
#6 Mar 23 2005 at 6:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Well first of all, a person in a 'persistent vegitative state' (brain dead) is completely different than someone who is 'brain damaged' or is mentally handicapped.. the latter two can actually still respond to stimuli (like sound, touch, or pain). The vegitative person can't.

Of course all I know about this case is what I've read, I don't know these people personally. And this is all just my opinion.

To me, it seems the thing they are trying to figure out is who's wishes to honor... the husband says she told him she never would've wanted to live like this, but her parents want her to stay on life support. So since she's unable to speak for herself, the courts are unsure who to go to next for the answer: her husband, or her parents.

She was only 26 when this happened to her.. her husband apparently was the only person she discussed end-of-life issues with. Lesson to learn here is that you're never to young to make out a living will... I've had one since I was 18. I think the politicians who have been involved with this case have gone a little overboard and are missing the real issue.

I work with people like this every day.. when you know there's no hope of recovery, it's really depressing to see family members come in and convince themselves that their loved one is improving... I mean, what can you say to them? And the husband I truly feel sorry for, trying to do what his wife wanted, and then having to fight with her family and the media making him out to be heartless. I don't know what my husband would do in a situation like that.

If they're going to let her die peacefully, then withdrawing her food, hydration, and medication is the only real way to do it. They will keep her comfortable, relieve her pain if she has any (which she wouldn't be able to communicate anyway), and let her die in peace. I don't know about you, but I couldn't imagine a better way to die; going out slowly, surrounded by family and friends. Most people never get to say goodbye to the people they love, but here... her family has that chance.

I seriously doubt it will change much in future healthcare, besides maybe having a clearer definition of the phrase "persistent vegitative state." The biggest thing I hope it will change is the number of people with living wills or power of attourney... something that clearly and legally states who makes decisions for you if you aren't able to. Anyone can get it, it's not expensive. Everyone thinks they'll never be in a situation like this, but it's possible.

Does allowing her to die change the value of human life? Absolutely not. To me, valuing human life includes not just keeping a person alive and healthy, but also respecting their opinions and beliefs, and honoring their wishes. Nurses and physicians have to take this into account! We're not just cells to keep alive, we have minds too. And if you decided you don't ever want to be kept alive on life support, you'd want your family to respect that decision too, even if it was hard for them.

Like I said, this is just my opinion, and I'm not trying to argue or anything (the media has been doing that enough for everyone). So... please don't flame me if you don't agree with what I said.
#7 Mar 23 2005 at 7:26 AM Rating: Decent
if this be the ase why not give her parentssome piece and euthinize her instead o letting them what their daughters body starve.
Edited, Wed Mar 23 08:47:55 2005 by Glitterngld

Edited, Wed Mar 23 09:07:13 2005 by Glitterngld
#8 Mar 23 2005 at 8:34 AM Rating: Decent
Edited: Due to the fact Glitter edited her above statement, therefor mine makes no sense. Glitter wrote above before she edited: quote: "The Husband is just greedy and wants her to die so he can collect the insurance money and give it to his new family."


Wow Glitter, I did not know that you knew the husband personally. You saying that he just wants her to die and collect the insurance money, must mean you talked to him and he told you this right?, or is it just an opionion of yours?. I think maybe he also had hope of recovery and after a few years he realized it was never going to happen, so he brought up the fact of her telling him that she never wanted to live this way (as I believe most of us would feel, at least I would.) I see some people believe that it is against God to take aways her tubes and let her go to her final resting place, but isn't playing God in the first place to keep her alive with the feeding tubes?, a few hundred years ago if this happened to someone they would have died shortly after and that was God's will, and now 15 years later she is still living on like support with no chance of recovery (as far as the docotors say). This is just my opinion of course, but thought I would share it.

Edited, Wed Mar 23 09:57:37 2005 by LionsFan
#9 Mar 23 2005 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
**
557 posts
Do judges hold too much power in making the final decsions?
--------------------------
Personally, I think it is sick and despicable for Terri Shiavo to be put on display in the media the way she has been. I could care less about the husband, mother, father, brother or friends. Is there nothing private or personal anymore in this world? Are we not entitled to *humility* even on the brink of death?

I have stopped listening and watching the television reports on this simply because this poor woman has been paraded before cameras and print and become a political tool while clinging to life. IMO, the above phrase that Glitter wrote is the key phrase to this whole controversy about this poor woman who now, after one or two other attempts, is lying in bed having had her feeding tubes taken out *again*.

I think it is such a personal decision and can understand how both sides of the family feel.

Unfortunately, IMO, from what I understand, and without having had a living will allowed the courts to intervene. As a mother, I can well understand the position her parents took in wanting to hold onto whatever life their daughter showed if they thought there was or is hope. Whether her husband's motives were love or greed, we'll never know. Whether or not there is any chance for her to recover we'll never know.

I do know that my husband and I have discussed our wishes regarding life sustaining procedures in the event of a tragic illness; have them in writing and would not want the *government* involved in personal family decisions. However, if the courts can interven now on this personal decision; does that mean that a precedent will be set in the event a Living Will is written that the courts could then over rule that?

Consider this: family members who don't agree with decisions made between a husband and wife and only want their loved one to *live* would fight through whatever means possible to keep that person alive.

Who is right? Hard call. My heart goes out to all of them - but most of all my heart goes out Terry Shiavo; I hope she finds peace, and rest for what must be a hellful and weary battle, soon

I just think we need to be careful about how far the government can go and become involved in our private lives.
#10 Mar 23 2005 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,139 posts
Quote:
Personally, I think it is sick and despicable for Terri Shiavo to be put on display in the media the way she has been. I could care less about the husband, mother, father, brother or friends. Is there nothing private or personal anymore in this world? Are we not entitled to *humility* even on the brink of death?



I agree it is dispicable, and should not be "The" media topic of the month. However, i also think that some good "May" come from this. Maybe, just maybe, as DagnyTaggart said, more people will have living wills. I also hope, that they will make a clear definition of what a " persistent Vegetative State" means. I also think that although it is a complete intrusion on these people lives, that it just might throw a little perspective to people. People get so wrapped up in "The now" part of life, we never stop to enjoy what we have. Seeing things as horrible as this might sink in to some people, and make them realize what life is really about. Although this is a terrible way for them to realize it, it is one positive out of a negative.


Quote:
is food are means of nutrition now considered medicine


This is the part of this situation that makes me sick. How can you starve someone? I can see maybe injecting some poison, or medicating them so much there body shuts down, but starving? Whats worse, is that a judge decided this was ok for them to do. I remeber back to doctor kavorkian (sp?), people were paying him to poison family members, who were in similar situations. To me, if i was in her postion, i wouldnt want to be starved to death, i would want to be taken out very quickly.

******Sad story dont read if your emotional******

My wifes father was diagnosed with brain cancer. They decided to operate, and while operating, they took i guess a little too much brain, because he could not longer speak. He knew what he wanted to say, and could think fairly well, but he could not speak. He tried and tried and tried, till he finally gave up and never tried again. About 8 months after surgery he died. He eventually was on so much medication, that not only could he not tspeak, but couldnt do much of anything else.

The point to me writing this, is that if i knew that brain surgery would give me only 8 months more to live, and would make my life hell for those 8 months, no one in the world would be able to convince me to get it done. What good is dragging out a horrible painful life for 8 extra months? I would much rather go sooner without all the treatments, and crap to go through.

I kinda feel the same for this poor lady. IF she does understand whats going on (which the doctors say she doesnt), she might want to pass. But without written proof, how could a judge grant them the ability to starve her? So i guess what im saying is i cant beleive someone could grant them the right to "off" this lady, without something in writting.

Id also like to mention, that more likely then not, the husband is so far in debt trying to take care of her, that insurance money will be gone as soon as he gets it. Unless he or his family is extremly rich, most medical coverages have a maximum life time pay out. 1-2 mil is a standard, and if shes been on life support for 15 years, i can guarantee you thats been long used up. Not to mention, that health insurance 15 years ago, had quite different caps and pricing and such.

It is very difficult to put yourself in the postition of the husband. Parnets have this natural life long love for their children, but spouses, have a different type of love. I am sure he loves her, but his life is basically over so long as she is alive. He cant really do much, but take care of her, see her, and work. Im not saying this because i agree, but the fact is, that people are selfish. How long should he be burdened with taking care of a lost cause? Again i dont agree, but i can certainly understand, how this would eventually wear someone out so bad, that they just want to be done with it. That they just want to be able to move on with their life, and try to forget about all the stuff that happened. I cant imagine how difficult that would be honestly, and i certainly feel bad for him (and the rest fo the family as well).

Anyways, ive rambled on long enough about this, i could go on for days and days, but i wont.

For anyone with any kind of faith, include these people in whatever communications you have with your higher being.




#11 Mar 23 2005 at 11:26 AM Rating: Good
**
557 posts
For anyone with any kind of faith, include these people in whatever communications you have with your higher being.

-----------------
Amen! ^^
#12 Mar 23 2005 at 1:12 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,139 posts
I think that was "Politically correct"?

#13 Mar 23 2005 at 1:24 PM Rating: Decent
simple fact, person who is "brain dead" has already died long ago, only functions of her body are the lower brain parts which controls only heart beat and reflex and such.

simple opinion, wutever the family might want to believe, this person is already dead. this case now is more about sooth the living(her parents) rather than saving her life.

my 2 cents
#14 Mar 23 2005 at 5:17 PM Rating: Decent
Forgive me for not knowing WTF you're talking about... but for ONCE could you make a topic on the FINAL FANTASY SHIVA BOARDS that could ACTUALLY BE about Shiva?

Just a thought...


Edit: For the idiots that can't take a joke... this was supposed to be a joke. THIS IS A JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited, Wed Mar 23 18:52:36 2005 by CrayolaInBastok
#15 Mar 23 2005 at 5:48 PM Rating: Decent
*
82 posts
gawd Crayola always have to be the antogonist aye? if you dont like the subject or "dont know" about it please stfu...Its your fault for reading it and if you dont like it shame on you, if it doesnt have to do with FFXI then dont read it its as simple as that.

Just a thawt.
#16 Mar 23 2005 at 5:51 PM Rating: Decent
I'm sorry you saw no humor in my comment. But for the majority of us that know Glitter and her posts, we all think they're stupid and don't make sense and I can swear than at least 80% that post on the forums can agree that she goes off.

If you don't like my post or whatever please stfu...Its your fault for reading it and if you dont like it shame on you, if it doesnt have to do with anything you've said then dont read it its as simple as that.

Just a thawt.
#17 Mar 23 2005 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
*
82 posts
wow someone has sand in thier ****** really i could give 2 ***** about what u say, seeing as tho ive read and haerd enough about you, and when you verbally attack my freinds i dont apprecitae it and really i know your ganna reply with some BS responce that im most likely ganna read and laugh at you for being a hanous bicth. BTW i know i cant spell so i dont care.

P.S <3 you

#18 Mar 23 2005 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
I wasn't verbally attacking anyone... do you NOT see the humor. OMG get a hobby!
#19 Mar 23 2005 at 7:17 PM Rating: Decent
*
82 posts
Tricen's care meter drops -.5.
Woot!
#20 Mar 25 2005 at 4:01 PM Rating: Decent
*
93 posts
actually, crayola's just snippy. i'm the atagonistic one.

i'm no doctor, but i am pretty certain i can read a brain scan and a medical chart to some degree of aptitude. mrs. s. has left the building. the main part of her brain that defines her as a person and regulates most autonomic functions is gone. in computer geek terms her cpu's fried and turned from silicon to glass.

what bothers me the most is how politicians are falling all over themselves to ***** this issue to score petty political points with their core voters.... then again, tom delay, bill frist, and brothers bush, nothing surprises me from those first-class partisan whoremonkeys. they are trying to **** on 200 years of state-rights and personal freedoms with their silly pandering for votes.

anyhoo, since i highly doubt any of us have been in a situation like this before, we are really in no position to judge anyone.

let her go peacefully.
#21 Mar 28 2005 at 1:54 AM Rating: Good
What the family doing is totally wrong. They are STARVING somebody to death! It doesn't matter if a person is in a brain-dead state or is conscious, it's just wrong. The minimum a hospital or doctor has to do is make sure that patients are eating healthy.
Those poor people, I hope to God nobody that reads this, or that I know will have to go through what they and thousands of people have gone through.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 17 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (17)