| News Posting |
not impressed yet |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Im still not impressed.
These changes finally acknowledge that enchanters are a pet class. Who here remembers how around 2 years ago we chanters were insulted by verant royally during The Great Enchanter Pet Nerf? To fix a problem with the way mage pets dual weild they changed all pets. The c |
| News Posting |
RE: not impressed yet |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
oops, wasnt logged in, that was me that posted. |
| News Posting |
SK pet |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Good |
| |
The reason the sk pet is not up to the same level as the rest of them is that the sk is a very effective tank in his own right, and with all the necro DoTs and Debuffs. Bringing the sk pet up in levels would be like allowing one player to control a necro who can outmelee many tanks and a similarly s |
| News Posting |
One question... |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I have only one question... WHEN?!?!
I think these are some wonderful changes, and love the aspect of getting full credit for using what is really our primary weapon. The Mez changes will finally (perhaps) let us be valued as group members instead of red-headed step children...
Tyrac Traleblazer
|
| News Posting |
RE: left out one thing |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
That would be SICK. I've played an SK quite a lot lately, got to level 36 and I solo very effectively. With a pet that was level 27 I'd be incredibly overpowered. SK pets are useful the way they are - just think of them as your most mana-efficient dot. (One that trains things onto you occasionall |
| News Posting |
RE: not impressed yet |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Enchanters are not a pet class. They have them lil flying swirds and shields to save their butts when they get into trouble. Not to send in to kill a mob. Enchanters are mezers and... "enchanters". |
| News Posting |
Whoh! |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
I'm a dedicated EQ player, and i'v been playing it for almost a year now. Looking at these screen shots... its crazy! These guys ARE frightning. I like it. As for the comments about the looks of the female characters, i'm mature and all, but hey. We all like it. Whether we decide to admit it or not. |
| News Posting |
RE: not impressed yet |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
How can you possibly say that enchanters are not a pet class. Just because their pets look like inanimate objects does not make them any less of a pet... that is why the spells have the word "animation" - they animate them. The only reason that the chanter pets are only used to "save |
| News Posting |
RE: not impressed yet |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
pets to a mage are our root our mez and our tanks we cant debuf the mobs and we cant boost ourselves we pay a hefty price for our pets and try playing without breeze/clarity or root and see how much you like spending hundreds of mana to summon pet and all his accesories every time you summon one not |
| News Posting |
RE: hakama |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I dig the hakama look as well.Aikido the way of harmony & power. |
| News Posting |
RE: PvP |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
i think Meridian 59 started all the mmorpg's and it was 100% pvp and costed 30.00 a month and they had lots of subsribers til eq |
| News Posting |
no more old chars |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I play only 1 char a hum war,folks dont get it but i like just have 1 char.Most folks for most the time realy have only 1 char there main all the other while they might be fun take away time form there main.That & i hope this game wood let me kept my char in upgraded world for EVER.Well i hear a |
| EQ Item |
Helpful information on the quest |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
For someone in there teens to mid 20's looking to gain faction in qeynos and they are slaughtering gnolls. This quest is kinda worth it. I zoned into BB around level 28 *bard* and pretty much laid waste to all the Elites and commanders in the zone. I hired a few smaller level groups to slaughter a |
| News Posting |
SK pets |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Perhaps SK pets are better when you get a bit higher, but at level 14 before my new pet at 15, my pet wasn't even a dot. It couldn't scratch anything that would give me any kind of decent exp. I shudder to think how useless Boney is going to be at level 21. It won't be able to hit anything, becau |
| News Posting |
Thank You |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
As a necro I appreciate Verant addressing this. Don't know how many times in a dungeon my pet has overshot me when I have moved and inadvertently pulled a mob that I didn't intend to pull. Will also be nice not haveing to worry about trying to out damage my pet so i get the xp for the kill...and bel |
| EQ Item |
RE: quest item? |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
WHERE IS HE PLS TELL ME WHERE HE Spawns... what area???
Thx
|
| News Posting |
Enchanters |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Bah Enchanters have it all over mages for
groupage, so live with the winie pet.
|
| News Posting |
RE: not impressed yet |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Sorry, animations are not real pets. Real pets understand /pet commands. An enchanter's version of a "real pet" is made via charm. |
| EQ Item |
RE: Drops off Shaman |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Me too. I got one off a shaman, this morning. |
| News Posting |
Shaman |
Garborg |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Well I can say this will make all classes with pets jobs easier, no more worrying about pets in dungons, breaking mezz's, ect. I think we will see a lot more usage of pets now because of this, I know Shaman will. Always afraid to pull it out in a lot of higher ends zones, but now it can be done with |
| News Posting |
enc pets |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen |
| Camelot |
Damage |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen |
| News Posting |
enc pets |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen |
| News Posting |
RE: left out one thing |
REDACTED |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Sk pets are useful when you first get them at level 9. After that they're not all that useful again till 49. Once you get your 49 pet spell you'll begin to notice a difference. At 52 you'll REALLY notice a difference. I have a 53 sk and I lug around a sack filled with velium and drakkel forged we |
| News Posting |
At last, something useful |
Anonymous |
Jun 4th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
As a Mage, I welcome these changes. My only concern is those rumors that you cannot "force" a pet to attack a mezzed monster.
I always thought Enchanters weren't too good at soloing. Not because they can't debuff a monster up the wazzoo (one reason why I never duel an Enchanter), but be |
