| EQ Item |
RE: Effect |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
All DoT spells under a certain level (I think its in the mid 30's) will cost only 75% of the base mana cost |
| News Posting |
RE: Melee classes being mistreated? |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
I guess I should have mention I play a Necro, a Cleric, an Enchanter, and Wizzard. They all arange from levels 10-20 but my warrior is the highest level and I play him the most cause I can still group with my Brothers with him. Anyway what I was talking about was the pets not sharing exp anymore.. |
| News Posting |
pets |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
the new pet update will help me when i solo, glad for that. but one thing if iam looking for a group i state i not use pet. i have no proublem grouping then, if asked i will summond warder. many times i run solo with out pet and no group to build up my stats. so hope some get a idea from my way of |
| News Posting |
Programmer |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Excellent |
| |
I'm not sure that firing the programmer is the answer.
It had been mentioned a long time ago, by Aradune, that the code had gotten to massive, and very difficult to adjust, and that changing one thing in one place, would affect another class inadvertantly somewhere else. Fixing many of these, is |
| EQ Item |
RE: price |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Don't forget about the monk that didn't practice Feign Death ;)
Sorry for the off topic post but I just had to mention that one...that's right, it has happened! |
| EQ Item |
focus effects... |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Excellent |
| |
i might be wrong... but doesnt it seem stupid to put a spell that only effects spells level 20 and lower on an item thats hard to obtain even at 40? how many level 40s use a level 20 dot? im not saying it doesnt happen, but this seems pretty stupid to me... |
| EQ Item |
Focus Item effect |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
This item's focus has been changed to Summoning Haste 1 |
| News Posting |
Idol of The Underking |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Better effect now... is Improved Healing III
Miralynn Lonewulf
55 Ranger
Tholuxe Paelles |
| News Posting |
RE: I agree |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Well I DIS-agree. I am a programmer as well, and i can tell you that an undertaking like the EQ online game is so complex I am amazed that there are as few problems as there are. Yes, there should probably be a wee bit more testing before the release of a patch, but to act so surprised that a produc |
| EQ Item |
RE: So far away, goodbye extended range |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Now how stupid is that? Put a lvl 20 and under affect on a lvl 30 item... VI is clearly losing it's mind. |
| News Posting |
level change |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I think the levels should be changed.
Level I affect spells 1 - 30
Level II affect spells 1 - 50
level III affect spells 1 - 60
At the level you can actually get the items the spells you would be using are higher than would be benefited by the items.
gives a nice degenerating scale |
| EQ Item |
druid effects |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I am a druid and it glows when i cast spells like SOW so it is not just necro.
Edited, Fri Jun 7 03:48:43 2002 |
| EQ Item |
RE: Effect |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
It has also activated, while using Snare, and Root. |
| News Posting |
RE: programmer should be FIRED |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Really? Where would you stand then? ROFL
I know it's pointless to convince you ppl(well, most of you) that being a programmer on such a big project is frustrating as hell. I've been there(massive Delphi project). Even after 1,5 yrs not a single programmer knew 1 litle bit of the modules from other |
| EQ Item |
They changed it!!! |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Instead of Regent Conservation 3, it is now increase damage 2. I think this kind of bites.. now i dont have a item good until 60's :::slaps knee::: but i must say it is nice having increased damage. I reguarly nuke for 150 and i did a 175 just earlier!!! |
| EQ Item |
They changed it!!! |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Sub-Default |
| |
Instead of Regent Conservation 3, it is now increase damage 2. |
| News Posting |
RE: I agree |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Here here, totally agree with you mate, the sheer number of users and differnet combinations of PC components possible is astounding but don't forget they are working with direct x to get around the whole multiple system configurations thing, even direct x isn't an inexhaustive list of part types. A |
| EQ Item |
RE: focus effects... |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I fully agree. Many Items are like this. sooo they are encouraging twinking. That's all there is to it. |
| EQ Item |
RE: So far away, goodbye extended range |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Good |
| |
I completely agree, this level 20 and below spell allows me to snare, and flame lick my heart's content. Honestly I would really like to see some ranger love soon, like a ranger pet; a ferret or something that auto forages and increases you CHA by 30 points. |
| News Posting |
RE: I agree |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Good |
| |
I can agree with you in part, but there is NEVER any excuse for releasing buggy software on the level that SONY has been releasing. Yes SONY. Verant is nothing but a name, SONY is running the whole ball game. I have been a Software Engineer for over 22 years and would never allow software this un |
| EQ Item |
NICE ROGUE ITEM |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
kickass dmg/delay |
| News Posting |
RE: level change |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Lets all be honest here, if you where to fight for these four (4) items at lower than level 20, which is possible to realisticly attain?
1. Golden Ear Stud
2. Cougar Claw Earring
3. Drake Hide Sleeves
4. Robe of The Oracle
Answer should be 1. Which now with the focus effect give you Extende |
| EQ Item |
Effect |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
These boots have been updated since last patch to recieve the effect Extended Range II |
| EQ Item |
For Honor Players |
REDACTED |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
The centi and all those other non-earned 1hs are great, but i have a ranger I have been playing and have been using only the stuff I loot, make, or come across on a non-looted mob. Maybe I am a fool, but getting this weapon myself as opposed to using something I didn't earn would mean more to me. - |
| News Posting |
RE: verant |
Anonymous |
Jun 7th, 2002 |
Default |
| |
I think its obvious that you work for verant |
