| EQ Item |
Graphic? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Negative |
| |
How does this sword look when held? Hopefully something like its icon, but bigger and badder =) |
| EQ Item |
er..ok, if you say so |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Default |
| |
How can you say that this should go to a ranger first? Oh.. wait. You [i]are[/i] a ranger.
[quote]This should go to a Ranger first unless they have better... cause a warrior should have better by the time they get to the tower of solusk ro [/quote]
No.. not everybody is going to have the best |
| EQ Item |
er..ok,ifyou say so |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Excellent |
| |
well i think that all that are able to use it should have a chance to get it.
Ranger of the 47 season
Povar
Edited, Fri Dec 20 18:27:02 2002 |
| EQ Quest |
RE: wow |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Default |
| |
I'm sure since it's a gate to the plane of knowledge it's a typo and it ports you to a place in the "know" not now.
Edited, Fri Dec 20 19:22:59 2002 |
| EQ Item |
/sigh |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Sub-Default |
| |
as much as i hate it, i would not be caught using this in a raid situation (i am a shadow knight)...and i hope the pali's and rangers (/laugh) wouldnt be either...this thing has huge aggro on it with the ratio alone, but adding in that proc is just sickening, esspecially someone with primal/ancient |
| EQ Item |
Huh |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Negative |
| |
It looks a bit like the style of swords Auron used in Final Fantasy 10... |
| EQ Item |
Well... |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Sub-Default |
| |
...considering where it's gotten, it's not that great. It looks like the mace Karana himself holds |
| EQ Item |
Arg!! |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Default |
| |
Hmm cant quite understand why they would put an agro proc on a 2 hander for warriors only.
Doesnt seem to make sense. I could understand if they used something better than this or even better than enraging blow. More along the lines of a proc that caused 1000 agro since this is a 2 hander. B |
| EQ Item |
RE: Heheheeeee |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Good |
| |
Uh...
Planes.
60+.
A bard will NOT be MT. |
| EQ Item |
RE: Uber |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I know what it means... just the fact that they actually use the word 'Uber' in the spell data file to describe mobs sort of got my attention ;) |
| EQ Item |
? |
Cromigor |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
does anyone see anything wrong here? Its focus effect affects 44 and under and the lvl to attain is 45. It's NODROP, which eliminates reselling it for profit, so what was VI thinking (ask a stupid question, get flamed) |
| EQ Item |
heh |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Negative |
| |
the graphic is like the icon it has, looks like a big 2hs but its 1hs...drops on the boss mob in the pig pen in tactics. |
| EQ Item |
er..ok,the short bus stops for Rbecka |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Good |
| |
In one respect Dennik is right, if you are hunting in a zone like the Tower of Sol Ro <and would like to survive to loot something:)> then chances are your Tank's are going to be wielding EB procc'ing weps<BoC etc.>, or at least one's with a nasty stun element to the proc <SoD etc.> |
| EQ Class |
Fletching? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I am a level 17 ranger and have just achieved level 102 in fletching. The components I used were Hooked Point, Bone Shaft, Shield Fletch and Small Nock. I changed from Bone Shaft to Wood Vane and now I get a message You cannot combine these items in this container type. Any help would be greatly app |
| EQ Class |
Missing HPS? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I just decided to buy a membership and I filled out the character sheet for my level 47 barb warrior. After I filled everything out I noticed that it said I should have more HPs than in reality I have. So I created another character and filled in his stats with nothing on him just to see what his hp |
| EQ Item |
RE: eh |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Sub-Default |
| |
I wonder how this chest piece got 87ac while the warrior chest piece only got 63...lucky bards.
I just realized that the warrior chest piece I saw was the ornate plate and not the elemental plate..guess the warrior one is going to be quite the sight to see.
Edited, Fri Dec 20 23:21:49 |
| EQ Item |
drool |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Negative |
| |
Jeezus! A 1hs thats fast, has ac, and 15 dex...man...wishes t said war/rng instead of war only :( |
| EQ Item |
don't read if you aren't gonna flame me |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I would think the warriors would pass on this seeing how the proc isn't that great of an aggro enhancer. I myself as an enchanter have a hard time pulling aggro off my sk buddy I always group with and he is far from uber. We had a double epicced ranger trying to outtaunt him and could not do it for |
| EQ Quest |
Sarnak Dragoon |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
Is there any special location for that spawn? Been extinguishing Sarnak Fort for hours now and haven't had a Sarnak Dragoon on track with my ranger
any help appreciated :) |
| EQ Class |
Resistant Skin |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I know we get a few upgrades to the level 20 fr/cr buff, and we get nice MR upgrades with the shielding line. But do we get any upgrades to the resistant skin spell? Or just the familiars for Pr/Dr?
|
| EQ Item |
RE: PC |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Default |
| |
in my opinion it will all depend on the recommended/required lvl and the components needed to make them, I would say 20-30k, just my opinion though... |
| EQ Item |
RE: odd names |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Default |
| |
if its worn out... imagine what it was like when it was new...! |
| EQ Item |
hmm... |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I bet this is court-yard trash (no pun intended) so I bet we will be seeing alot of these for sale very soon, probly around 5k with recommended lvl of 50-55 (posably 53 judging by other PoP items) |
| EQ Quest |
Doesn't always work in courtyard |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Decent |
| |
I pulled the courtyard. I only got 5 skels. I was near the corner. Don't know if that had anything to do with it. |
| EQ Class |
RE: Where to hunt? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2002 |
Excellent |
| |
Level 33 warrior, I would suggest hunting in HK, group until 35 or so, then, if you are well equiped you can solo the WR. The exp is amazing, fair loot. It may be safe to have a healer, while slower exp, much safer. I level to 41 in HK soloing form 35.
I suggest you take several stacks of b |
