News Posting |
@HOME no longer |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
All former @home.com addresses are now @attbi.com, assuming Mr. McQuaid stayed with his ISP. |
EQ Item |
RE: Umm |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Well two of the Beastlord class (Iksar and Vah Shir) have inherently natural AC anyway, so this would be reasonable for them, bit sucky for the barbs/ogres/trolls though. Best comparison (rather than druid planar from Fear) would be to find the BL hate/fear planar armor. |
EQ Zone |
Solo |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Negative |
|
|
EQ Zone |
Solo |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
First of all I would like to say that LOIO is a really cool zone as far as the Diversity of life and general expierience opportunity. Also, beleive it or not, A level 15 can solo WITHOUT buffs. I only say this because A) I know a lot of people who think it is impossible to solo here,B) I have perso |
News Posting |
question |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Good |
|
What did he mean by Bottom Feeding? |
News Posting |
RE: @HOME no longer |
REDACTED |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
You are incorrect.
Not ALL of @Home has been changed over to attbi.com (I should know, I still have an @Home address).
ATT was not the only Excite@Home company (for example Cox & Comcast). |
News Posting |
Actually... |
Anonymous |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Excellent interview, btw, I really enjoyed it and it also answered several of my questions about Brad!
Not to flame or anything, but, I have Cox@home and my email address is still @home.com, so I'd assume it is only some of the addresses, maybe those that have AT&T@home? |
News Posting |
RE: Wtf |
Anonymous |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
err...
They arent really porn ads... Just really odd ways to make revenue. Unless you consider purchasing a mail order bride porn!
|
News Posting |
bottom feeding |
Anonymous |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Im pretty sure he means high(er) level players camping greens purely for loot. This is what led to the controversial trivial loot code. |
News Posting |
Can't wait |
Anonymous |
Dec 18th, 2001 |
Default |
|
It'll be a ways away, but I just can't wait to see what Brad has in store for us. He's probably more qualified than most anyone to create a game with all of the good parts of everquest, none of the bad, and plenty of new and interesting :)
I wish I had a time machine myself, although not to trav |
EQ Item |
sell price |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Any ideas on what these things should be selling for? |
EQ Item |
RE: Hmm... |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
MNK DRU BST, hm dont see anything interesting about the class restrictions, the 3 leather classes |
EQ Quest |
hmm... |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Do you have to do these in succession? The tunic is pretty nice, but the others are not so good for a twink. Was wondering if i can just turn in the 4 bucklers and get the tunic with out doing the other quests. Yes, I know, I am lazy. |
EQ Item |
also |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
This is not a proc item......you right click it and it will automatticly work.....you get 5 charges it takes away from the agility and adds to the strength. |
EQ Item |
RE: RIP Dylan Starsine |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Excellent |
|
Sorry Vaelenu...can't recall any other way to get page 34 without the Jester card. But on the one hand, it is true...it doesn't matter which page you get first. Good Luck, hope you get it soon. I really don't think faction makes a difference on how soon you get the Jester card.
I was dubious t |
EQ Item |
oh for real? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
ummm lupine dagger is lore, you cannot have two... |
News Posting |
RE: Emotes |
Anonymous |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
STFU loser! |
News Posting |
RE: Emotes |
Anonymous |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
you need to stop poking other guys in the ass! |
News Posting |
RE: Emotes |
Anonymous |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
take your penis out of your mouth when you speak queer! |
EQ Item |
RE: RIP Dylan Starsine |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Excellent |
|
Thanks very much Finnabarr, I will try again tonight :)
BTW, you wouldn't be related to the bard Erryl (Erroyl?) Flynn on the Tribunal server would you?
|
EQ Item |
Ok, who really cares? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Excellent |
|
I hate to seem rude and all, cause I'm definitely not trying to, but I must say it's somewhat *dumb* to come onto this forum and say: "NO YOU CAN'T HAVE THIS BECAUSE YOU ARE A CHANTER! THIS IS ONLY FOR CLERICS!" Umm, I would think that would be up to the raid leader, not some snot-faced li |
EQ Zone |
RE: Ghoulbane |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
The problem isn't the boy holding the weapon, it's his buddies - two mid 30s pallys might pull it, but I'd recomend having a tank along and a cleric. |
EQ Item |
RE: Revision |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
The damage bonus doesn't really affect base damage. It's a formula that factors in weapon type, level, and I think atk bonus. |
EQ Item |
Rarity? |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Anyone know the rarity of this? Mob? Lvl? Location? Any info is awesome thx.
Ruziel Frost
60th Enchanter, Xegony sayz FU! =) |
EQ Item |
RE: Graphic |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Got one of these last night and it doesn't look like a normal longsword, it looks like a bronze sword.. this may be a SoL addition don't know because I can't remember what bronze looked like before SoL. it's a nice sword and hits in mid twenties and is fast, I thoroughly recommend the trip to RE c |