| EQ Item |
Where is he |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Default |
| |
I sure think its a nice Scimi. I've been hunting in The Grey for a few days now, and haven't seen hierophant Gerek at all. I have killed Hierophant Grazen several times though. Any information of where Gerek spawns would be really helpfull. Did you see him at the ruins, temple, lake or castle? which |
| EQ Item |
potion |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
this is found on the lizard cenobite inside the bubble in Cazic Thule the zone. its a rare drop and the common is ravenscale boots.
It usually goes for 600pp but prices will vary on server to where pvp servers they fetch high prices because of the ability to cause massive trains to kill the enem |
| EQ Quest |
what lvl is this quest |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
what lvl is this qust and is the thing good for how much time you spend on it |
| EQ Item |
RE: no more PLing and twinking i guess |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
Would you actually group with a level 50 monk if you found out he had only been playing his class for 4 days? I know I sure as hell wouldn't!
Equipment ain't jack without some skills to back it up. Not only did the melee skills on that monk suffer horribly because they leveled way too damn fast |
| News Posting |
RE: Kill a lot of TWINKING, and only allow ONE CHAR per serv |
REDACTED |
Dec 23rd, 2001 |
Good |
| |
There would still be twinking no matter what you do. There are people out there, like me, that own more than one account and play both regularly. I can powerlevel myself, twink or whatever, if i wanted. So if they restricted the amount of characters, it has two drawbacks that i can see.
1 learni |
| EQ Item |
rare drop |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
The hood seems to be a rare drop, got all other parts after cleaning the fungus tunnels 5 times in a row and got none. |
| EQ Item |
RE: WIS? |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
i thought bards mana never went down thus it didnt matter anyways ?
aside from that... verant randomly sticks stats on everything. its not uncommon to find a stat on a class specific peice of armor that a class has no "real" need for.
just as an example shaman totemic armor (mid lev |
| EQ Item |
Well, see its like this, |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
its not Allakhazam's people putting the recommended level, nor is it the submitter, its verant. How do i know? I have several peices of moktor armor. And they all say the same thing, Recommended level of 50. Enjoy, this and the raldukan armor are great. |
| EQ Item |
RE: Whoever Thinks HP is nothing... |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
HP is important, but AC is still KING! Complete heal has about a 10sec cast time, try sitting and staring at a blank wall for 10secs and notice how long that is, then thing about mobs that hit for 300 with a delay of about 2, and quad attack plus bashes/kicks...that means you can take about 3k+dama |
| EQ Item |
RE: Ack... |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
and what tank in their right mind isnt obsessed with AC? sorry couldnt resist, you left it so open-ended |
| EQ Item |
RE: Unkonwn bodytype? |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
Once luclin came about, they added "Wolf" as a body type.. You don't show up as a wolf in who, but the %r macro (race of target) shows wolf.
|
| EQ Item |
Hmmm |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
| |
I'm guessing that these could have "Effect: Summon Pile of Horse Shit" and mages would still kill and maim for them. All classes listed should be after these. Kudos Verant for making a nice pair of gloves with awesome stats AND a useful effect. |
| EQ Item |
Recommended Level |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
Items with a recommended level can be looted and equipped by people under the recommended level, but when the item is equipped, it's statistics are reduced. So, equipped by a 10th lvl warrior, this would not have 27AC. The effective AC is placed in () next to the real stat on the item.
Unfortuna |
| EQ Item |
The Rock |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
My Mage, 50 and a friend 51 Enc took about 4-5 hrs to get one of these. If you want one I suggest not killing the bugs until you have it so they don't aggro on ya while pulling stones. |
| EQ Item |
Ah ok that makes sense |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
Yeah someone else said the same thing in a thread on another item. The stats and everything are the same they said but the AC is reduced. |
| EQ Item |
BS |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
a rogue would BS pretty hard with this against undead, 16dmg is a bunch, more then the epic if im not mistaken |
| EQ Item |
RE: Probably rogue only |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
"The only thing useful on this helm (compared to Imbrued helm from Hate or SS Helm) is the bonus to poison save, which would only be used in very specific encounters."
Which, if you do or don't remember, is what Verant was trying to go for in this expansion: Make more situational equip |
| EQ Item |
interested |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
| |
Im interested in buying this item but not for more then 200pp.
Amadius DeLioncourt
Lanys Tyvl
Edited, Mon Dec 24 13:12:01 2001 |
| EQ Item |
wheee |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
This is much better than innate hand to hand, even if your hand to hand skill is maxed. At level 60, human monks are 14/26 with their hands (assuming they don't have their epic *scoff*), and iksar are 14/27. This weapon has a worse ratio, but if you plug this badboy into your primary slot you get a |
| EQ Item |
10hp.. give or take a death |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
Just wanted to say that anyone that says 10hp isn't important hasn't FD with 3hp before.
Nothing like training the war at the ry'gorr fort into CC and getting stunned at the gate... |
| EQ Item |
RE: re |
REDACTED |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
It would be a better backstabber against vampyres, but remember the epi has a 40% haste proc, which should make it a 15/15 weapon |
| News Posting |
Anti-Twink |
Anonymous |
Dec 24th, 2001 |
Decent |
| |
when Blizard made Diablo 2, they put in a mild anti-twink system of having a level requirement on aobut 10% of the items, and 75% of the worthwhile items.
if everquest were to put a level minimum on everything (yes, your bronze long sword that level 30 gave you when she killed a guard counts too) |
| News Posting |
to twink or not... |
Anonymous |
Dec 25th, 2001 |
Default |
| |
After having read the interview and all of the comments afterwards.. I must say that in most cases I was pleased with all that I read.. I have no qualms about twinking, never did.. in fact when I started I received many many good items from a now lev 60 troll warrior friend of mine. My first charac |
| EQ Item |
Another problem... |
REDACTED |
Dec 25th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
| |
Okay, we all know how the "situational" equipment works...so...this gets me thinking...why did they even put this armor out? No bard after 50 will need this bad equip, seriously. Everyone over 50 should have at least plane or velious quested armor by now. That leaves people under 50... yet |
| News Posting |
What a J.O. |
Anonymous |
Dec 25th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
| |
Wow talk about being out of touch. Could you believe that guy? Looking back, we knew Gordon Wrinn was a big problem with EQ, and somehow got promoted. Now we know that this guy, Brad McQuaid, was even more of a problem behind the scenes. No doubt the reason Brad was promoted was to get him away |
