| Page | Subject | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Zone (Bestiary) | Chard B zoneline | Apr 05 2006 12:15pm | Decent |
| Preview: | Chardok B zone is the lever is behind the waterfall on the west wall near the bank.. | ||
| EQ Monster | DDA fight | Feb 08 2006 8:37pm | Decent |
| Preview: | DDA hits for 1100 Max, his pets for 750. Offtank his pets, use lots for cures on healers for his AE (put them all in one group with MT to cycle the R ... | ||
| EQ Monster | Strat | Jan 24 2006 10:40pm | Decent |
| Preview: | Mob: Girplan Spiritleecher http://eqbeastiary.allakhazam.com/search.shtml?id=16739 Zone: Dranik's Scar Level: 71+ Hit Points: 100k+ Mi ... | ||
| Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| News Posting | RE: left out one thing | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| That would be SICK. I've played an SK quite a lot lately, got to level 36 and I solo very effectively. With a pet that was level 27 I'd be incredibly overpowered. SK pets are useful the way they are - just think of them as your most mana-efficient dot. (One that trains things onto you occasionall | ||||
| News Posting | RE: not impressed yet | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| Enchanters are not a pet class. They have them lil flying swirds and shields to save their butts when they get into trouble. Not to send in to kill a mob. Enchanters are mezers and... "enchanters". | ||||
| News Posting | RE: not impressed yet | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| How can you possibly say that enchanters are not a pet class. Just because their pets look like inanimate objects does not make them any less of a pet... that is why the spells have the word "animation" - they animate them. The only reason that the chanter pets are only used to "save | ||||
| News Posting | RE: not impressed yet | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| pets to a mage are our root our mez and our tanks we cant debuf the mobs and we cant boost ourselves we pay a hefty price for our pets and try playing without breeze/clarity or root and see how much you like spending hundreds of mana to summon pet and all his accesories every time you summon one not | ||||
| News Posting | RE: hakama | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| I dig the hakama look as well.Aikido the way of harmony & power. | ||||
| News Posting | RE: PvP | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| i think Meridian 59 started all the mmorpg's and it was 100% pvp and costed 30.00 a month and they had lots of subsribers til eq | ||||
| News Posting | RE: Give the Design Team Some Credit | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| LOL....You think Mage's and Beastlords are the only ones who have worthy pests??? You need to do a little research on Necro's before you post again buddy =) Compare the stats between the Mage and Necro pets level for level. You will find they are almost identical on HP and damage. The only excep | ||||
| News Posting | SK pets | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Perhaps SK pets are better when you get a bit higher, but at level 14 before my new pet at 15, my pet wasn't even a dot. It couldn't scratch anything that would give me any kind of decent exp. I shudder to think how useless Boney is going to be at level 21. It won't be able to hit anything, becau | ||||
| News Posting | Thank You | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| As a necro I appreciate Verant addressing this. Don't know how many times in a dungeon my pet has overshot me when I have moved and inadvertently pulled a mob that I didn't intend to pull. Will also be nice not haveing to worry about trying to out damage my pet so i get the xp for the kill...and bel | ||||
| News Posting | Enchanters | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| Bah Enchanters have it all over mages for groupage, so live with the winie pet. | ||||
| News Posting | RE: not impressed yet | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Sorry, animations are not real pets. Real pets understand /pet commands. An enchanter's version of a "real pet" is made via charm. | ||||
| News Posting | Shaman | Garborg | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Well I can say this will make all classes with pets jobs easier, no more worrying about pets in dungons, breaking mezz's, ect. I think we will see a lot more usage of pets now because of this, I know Shaman will. Always afraid to pull it out in a lot of higher ends zones, but now it can be done with | ||||
| News Posting | enc pets | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen | ||||
| Camelot | Damage | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen | ||||
| News Posting | enc pets | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| enchanter pets are still the WEAKEST pet out there. they come close to SK pets. i know i got a 15 enchanter with a pet that still cons GREEN to me. it WON"T listen | ||||
| EQ Server | RE: Calling All Actors..... | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Sub-Default |
| I see Stormhammer is also a haven for homosexual activity | ||||
| News Posting | RE: left out one thing | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Sk pets are useful when you first get them at level 9. After that they're not all that useful again till 49. Once you get your 49 pet spell you'll begin to notice a difference. At 52 you'll REALLY notice a difference. I have a 53 sk and I lug around a sack filled with velium and drakkel forged we | ||||
| News Posting | At last, something useful | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| As a Mage, I welcome these changes. My only concern is those rumors that you cannot "force" a pet to attack a mezzed monster. I always thought Enchanters weren't too good at soloing. Not because they can't debuff a monster up the wazzoo (one reason why I never duel an Enchanter), but be | ||||
| News Posting | Melee Classes being mistreated? | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| News Posting | RE: Nice | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| I agree, a most excellent job. The stuff about the elven city can be found in the manuals, I have heard of the Magi'kot, and some of hte other stuff I remember reading, as well. This site has a small gamelore section, but a good place is planeteverquest.com I have not read about the wood elf tree | ||||
| News Posting | Melee classes being mistreated? | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Hello. I have decided not to sign in and stay anonymous for flaming purposes. I hope Verant reads this and I just want to put in my 2cp. With Luclin and now this, casters (including pallies,shadow knights,and ranger) have gotten new spells, med while sitting, and other such bonuses. But what have we | ||||
| EQ Item | Wrong name | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Sub-Default |
| Its malachite not male chite :P or what ever | ||||
| News Posting | A major boost for the Beastlord | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Wow, this is great news. I play a Beastlord and hate giving my xp's to my lovely pet. My pet is always out damaging me so and it takes forever to level. I'm surprised to not see more posts from the Beastlords in praise of this change. Thank you Verant for this change. Not to mention the benefits | ||||
| News Posting | Maybe a mage can get a group now??? | Anonymous | Jun 4th, 2002 | Default |
| As a mage this hopefully will be good.Many groups its seems do not want a mage with a pet for the simple reason is that they don't like a pet training mobs to them.I have a level 41 mage (almost 42) and it is hard to find a group.It is very lonely soloing all the time.I speak for many mages | ||||
| News Posting | RE: Melee classes being mistreated? | REDACTED | Jun 4th, 2002 | Decent |
| Most melee classes are rated by thier level (as is every class) and thier weapons and armor. A caster class is rated on thier spells. Int only helps for dragon type raids, and ac doesn't help much with our 145 max defense rating. Luclin not only increased the quality of armor and weapons for mele | ||||
Contact: Private Message
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC